• Do You Wait For Opponent To Respond For Game Pigeon Toed
• Do You Wait For Opponent To Respond For Game Pigeon Play
• Do You Wait For Opponent To Respond For Game Pigeon Today

'Turtles all the way down' is an expression of the problem of infinite regress. The saying alludes to the mythological idea of a World Turtle that supports the flat earth on its back. It suggests that this turtle rests on the back of an even larger turtle, which itself is part of a column of increasingly large world turtles that continues indefinitely (i.e., 'turtles all the way down').

The exact origin of the phrase is uncertain. In the form 'rocks all the way down', the saying appears as early as 1838.^[1] References to the saying's mythological antecedents, the World Turtle and its counterpart the World Elephant, were made by a number of authors in the 17th and 18th centuries.^[2][3]

The expression has been used to illustrate problems such as the regress argument in epistemology.

If you get a piece across the board to the opponent's king row, that piece becomes a king. Another piece is placed onto that piece so it is now two pieces high. King pieces can move in both directions, forward and backward. Once a piece is kinged, the player must wait until the next turn to jump out of the king row. During the First World War a pigeon named Cher Ami (dear friend) saved the lives of many French soldiers by carrying a message across enemy lines in the heat of battle. Cher Ami was shot in the chest and the leg, losing most of the leg to which the message was attached, but continued the 25-minute flight avoiding shrapnel and poison gas to get the message ho.

History[edit]

Discover the simple secret to unlocking your pigeon’s full potential with the comprehensive guide to pigeon nutrition: Pigeon Racing Nutrition Secrets Exposed. This manual was developed through years of experience and modified through countless scientific experiments on pigeon and avian health. Mar 20, 2018 It is a common courtesy to wait for your opponent to get into the “ready” position. Most people at the intermediate and advanced (pro) levels extend this courtesy to their opponents. I have some adult birds in my loft now that I am sure you could never get to stay. They would either fly home or die trying. In most cases life as a prisoner is the only answer. In the late 1800 the most heroic recorded flight was from a pigeon that was released in Africa and took 55 days to get home in England. Traveling over 7,000 miles. If you get a piece across the board to the opponent's king row, that piece becomes a king. Another piece is placed onto that piece so it is now two pieces high. King pieces can move in both directions, forward and backward. Once a piece is kinged, the player must wait until the next turn to jump out of the king row.

Background in Hindu mythology[edit]

Early variants of the saying do not always have explicit references to infinite regression (i.e., the phrase 'all the way down'). They often reference stories featuring a World Elephant, World Turtle, or other similar creatures that are claimed to come from Hindu mythology. The first known reference to a Hindu source is found in a letter by Jesuit Emanuel da Veiga (1549–1605), written at Chandagiri on 18 September 1599, in which the relevant passage reads:

Veiga's account seems to have been received by Samuel Purchas, who has a close paraphrase in his Purchas His Pilgrims (1613/1626), 'that the Earth had nine corners, whereby it was borne up by the Heaven. Others dissented, and said, that the Earth was borne up by seven Elephants; the Elephants' feet stood on Tortoises, and they were borne by they know not what.'^[5] Purchas' account is again reflected by John Locke in his 1689 tract An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, where Locke introduces the story as a trope referring to the problem of induction in philosophical debate. Locke compares one who would say that properties inhere in 'Substance' to the Indian who said the world was on an elephant which was on a tortoise, 'But being again pressed to know what gave support to the broad-back'd Tortoise, replied, something, he knew not what'.^[2] The story is also referenced by Henry David Thoreau, who writes in his journal entry of 4 May 1852: 'Men are making speeches .. all over the country, but each expresses only the thought, or the want of thought, of the multitude. No man stands on truth. They are merely banded together as usual, one leaning on another and all together on nothing; as the Hindoos made the world rest on an elephant, and the elephant on a tortoise, and had nothing to put under the tortoise.'^[6]

Modern form[edit]

In the form of 'rocks all the way down', the saying dates to at least 1838, when it was printed in an unsigned anecdote in the New-York Mirror about a schoolboy and an old woman living in the woods:

'The world, marm,' said I, anxious to display my acquired knowledge, 'is not exactly round, but resembles in shape a flattened orange; and it turns on its axis once in twenty-four hours.'

'Well, I don't know anything about its axes,' replied she, 'but I know it don't turn round, for if it did we'd be all tumbled off; and as to its being round, any one can see it's a square piece of ground, standing on a rock!'

'Standing on a rock! but upon what does that stand?'

'Why, on another, to be sure!'

'But what supports the last?'

'Lud! child, how stupid you are! There's rocks all the way down!'^[1]

A version of the saying in its 'turtle' form appeared in an 1854 transcript of remarks by preacher Joseph Frederick Berg addressed to Joseph Barker:

My opponent's reasoning reminds me of the heathen, who, being asked on what the world stood, replied, 'On a tortoise.' But on what does the tortoise stand? 'On another tortoise.' With Mr. Barker, too, there are tortoises all the way down. (Vehement and vociferous applause.)

Many 20th-century attributions claim that philosopher and psychologist William James is the source of the phrase.^[8] James referred to the fable of the elephant and tortoise several times, but told the infinite regress story with 'rocks all the way down' in his 1882 essay, 'Rationality, Activity and Faith':

Like the old woman in the story who described the world as resting on a rock, and then explained that rock to be supported by another rock, and finally when pushed with questions said it was 'rocks all the way down,' he who believes this to be a radically moral universe must hold the moral order to rest either on an absolute and ultimate should or on a series of shoulds 'all the way down.'^[9]

The linguist John R. Ross also associates James with the phrase:

How to get game pigeon on text. The following anecdote is told of William James. [..] After a lecture on cosmology and the structure of the solar system, James was accosted by a little old lady.

'Your theory that the sun is the centre of the solar system, and the earth is a ball which rotates around it has a very convincing ring to it, Mr. James, but it's wrong. I've got a better theory,' said the little old lady.

'And what is that, madam?' inquired James politely.

'That we live on a crust of earth which is on the back of a giant turtle.'

Not wishing to demolish this absurd little theory by bringing to bear the masses of scientific evidence he had at his command, James decided to gently dissuade his opponent by making her see some of the inadequacies of her position.

'If your theory is correct, madam,' he asked, 'what does this turtle stand on?'

'You're a very clever man, Mr. James, and that's a very good question,' replied the little old lady, 'but I have an answer to it. And it's this: The first turtle stands on the back of a second, far larger, turtle, who stands directly under him.'

'But what does this second turtle stand on?' persisted James patiently. /pigeon-toady-game-last-night.html.

To this, the little old lady crowed triumphantly,

'It's no use, Mr. James—it's turtles all the way down.'

In epistemology and other disciplines[edit]

The metaphor is used as an example of the problem of infinite regress in epistemology to show that there is a necessary foundation to knowledge, as written by Johann Gottlieb Fichte in 1794:^{[11][page needed]}

'If there is not to be any (system of human knowledge dependent upon an absolute first principle) two cases are only possible. Either there is no immediate certainty at all, and then our knowledge forms many series or one infinite series, wherein each theorem is derived from a higher one, and this again from a higher one, et., etc. We build our houses on the earth, the earth rests on an elephant, the elephant on a tortoise, the tortoise again--who knows on what?-- and so on ad infinitum. True, if our knowledge is thus constituted, we can not alter it; but neither have we, then, any firm knowledge. We may have gone back to a certain link of our series, and have found every thing firm up to this link; but who can guarantee us that, if we go further back, we may not find it ungrounded, and shall thus have to abandon it? Our certainty is only assumed, and we can never be sure of it for a single following day.'

David Hume references the story in his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion when arguing against God as an unmoved mover:^[3]

How, therefore, shall we satisfy ourselves concerning the cause of that Being whom you suppose the Author of Nature, or, according to your system of Anthropomorphism, the ideal world, into which you trace the material? Have we not the same reason to trace that ideal world into another ideal world, or new intelligent principle? But if we stop, and go no further; why go so far? why not stop at the material world? How can we satisfy ourselves without going on in infinitum? And, after all, what satisfaction is there in that infinite progression? Let us remember the story of the Indian philosopher and his elephant. It was never more applicable than to the present subject. If the material world rests upon a similar ideal world, this ideal world must rest upon some other; and so on, without end. It were better, therefore, never to look beyond the present material world. By supposing it to contain the principle of its order within itself, we really assert it to be God; and the sooner we arrive at that Divine Being, so much the better. When you go one step beyond the mundane system, you only excite an inquisitive humour which it is impossible ever to satisfy.

Bertrand Russell also mentions the story in his 1927 lecture Why I Am Not a Christian while discounting the First Cause argument intended to be a proof of God's existence:

If everything must have a cause, then God must have a cause. If there can be anything without a cause, it may just as well be the world as God, so that there cannot be any validity in that argument. It is exactly of the same nature as the Hindu's view, that the world rested upon an elephant and the elephant rested upon a tortoise; and when they said, 'How about the tortoise?' the Indian said, 'Suppose we change the subject.'

Notable modern allusions or variations[edit]

References to 'turtles all the way down' have been made in a variety of modern contexts. For example, 'Turtles All the Way Down' is the name of a song by country artist Sturgill Simpson that appears on his 2014 album Metamodern Sounds in Country Music.^[12] 'Gamma Goblins ('Its Turtles All The Way Down' Mix)' is a remix by Ott for the 2002 Hallucinogen album In Dub.^[13]Turtles All the Way Down is also the title of a 2017 novel by John Green about a teenage girl with obsessive–compulsive disorder.^[14]

Stephen Hawking incorporates the saying into the beginning of his 1988 book A Brief History of Time:^[15]

A well-known scientist (some say it was Bertrand Russell) once gave a public lecture on astronomy. He described how the earth orbits around the sun and how the sun, in turn, orbits around the centre of a vast collection of stars called our galaxy. At the end of the lecture, a little old lady at the back of the room got up and said: 'What you have told us is rubbish. The world is really a flat plate supported on the back of a giant tortoise.' The scientist gave a superior smile before replying, 'What is the tortoise standing on?' 'You're very clever, young man, very clever,' said the old lady. 'But it's turtles all the way down!'

Justice Antonin Scalia of the U.S. Supreme Court discussed his 'favored version' of the saying in a footnote to his plurality opinion in Rapanos v. United States:^[16]

In our favored version, an Eastern guru affirms that the earth is supported on the back of a tiger. When asked what supports the tiger, he says it stands upon an elephant; and when asked what supports the elephant he says it is a giant turtle. When asked, finally, what supports the giant turtle, he is briefly taken aback, but quickly replies 'Ah, after that it is turtles all the way down.'

Microsoft Visual Studio had a gamification plug-in that awarded badges for certain programming behaviors and patterns. One of the badges was 'Turtles All the Way Down', which was awarded for writing a class with 10 or more levels of inheritance. ^[17]

In Terry Pratchett's Discworld the flat planet is balanced on the backs of four elephants which in turn stand on the back of a giant turtle.

See also[edit]

• Chicken or the egg – Philosophical paradox, commonly stated as 'which came first: the chicken or the egg?'
• Cosmological argument – Argument for the existence of God
• Discworld – Fantasy book series
• Kurma – the tortoise form of the Hindu god Vishnu
• Matryoshka doll – Russian nested doll
• Münchhausen trilemma – A thought experiment used to demonstrate the impossibility of proving any truth
• Primum Mobile – Outermost moving sphere in the geocentric model of the universe
• Primum movens – Postulated primary cause of all activity in the universe
• Pyrrhonism – School of philosophical skepticism founded by Pyrrho, in Greece, 4th century, BCE
• Teleological argument – Argument for the existence of God
• Transfinite induction – mathematical concept
• Turtle Island (Native American folklore) – Name for North America among Native Americans
• The Siphonaptera – 1872 rhyme by Augustus De Morgan
• Yertle the Turtle and Other Stories – 1958 picture book collection by Dr. Seuss

References[edit]

Notes[edit]

Citations[edit]

1. ^ ^ab'Unwritten Philosophy'. New-York Mirror. 16 (12). September 15, 1838. p. 91.
2. ^ ^abJohn Locke (1689). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Book II, Chapter XXIII, section 2
3. ^ ^abDavid Hume (1779). Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, part 4.
4. ^J. Charpentier, 'A Treatise on Hindu Cosmography from the Seventeenth Century (Brit. Mus. MS. Sloane 2748 A).' Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, University of London 3(2) (1924), pp. 317-342, citing John Hay, De rebus Japonicis, Indicis, and Peruanis epistulæ recentiores (Antwerp, 1605, p. 803f.)
5. ^Will Sweetman, Indology mailing list, citing Dieter Henrich, 'Die 'wahrhafte Schildkröte' Hegel-Studien 2 (1963), pp. 281-91, and J. Charpentier, 'A Treatise on Hindu Cosmography from the Seventeenth Century (Brit. Mus. MS. Sloane 2748 A).' Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, University of London 3(2) (1924), pp. 317-342.
6. ^David M. Gross. 'TPL • Excerpts from H.D. Thoreau's journals (1852)'. The Picket Line.
7. ^Barker, Joseph (1854). Great Discussion on the Origin, Authority, and Tendency of the Bible, between Rev. J. F. Berg, D.D., of Philadelphia, and Joseph Barker, of Ohio. Boston: J. B. Yerrinton & Son, Printers. p. 48.
8. ^Robert Anton Wilson (1983). Prometheus Rising. Phoenix, AZ: New Falcon Publishers. p. 25. ISBN1-56184-056-4
9. ^James, William (July 1882). 'Rationality, Activity and Faith'. The Princeton Review: 82.
10. ^Ross, John R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. hdl:1721.1/15166. See page iv of the ms., page 4 of the electronic file.
11. ^Fichte, J. G. (1794). Ueber den Begriff der Wissenschaftslehre oder der sogenannten Philosophie (Concerning the Conception of the Science of Knowledge Generally) (A. E. Kroeger, Trans.).
12. ^Hendrickson, Matt (2014). 'Sturgill Simpson: Country Philosopher'. Garden & Gun. Retrieved 30 October 2017.
13. ^https://books.google.com/books?id=xxfGBQAAQBAJ&pg=PT154
14. ^Senior, Jennifer (October 10, 2017). 'In John Green’s ‘Turtles All the Way Down,’ a Teenager’s Mind Is at War With Itself.'The New York Times. Retrieved October 29, 2017.
15. ^Hawking, Stephen (1988). A Brief History of Time. Bantam Books. ISBN978-0-553-05340-1.
16. ^'Rapanos v. United States'. June 19, 2006. Section VII, footnote 14 – via Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute's Supreme Court collection.
17. ^'The coding game: Microsoft's Visual Studio gets badges, achievements and leaderboard'. January 18, 2012.

Bibliography[edit]

Do You Wait For Opponent To Respond For Game Pigeon Toed

Further reading[edit]

• Rudnicki, Robert (Spring 2010). 'Turtles All the Way Down: Foundation, Edifice, and Ruin in Faulkner and McCarthy'. The Faulkner Journal. Johns Hopkins University Press. 25 (2): 23–52. doi:10.1353/fau.2010.0002. S2CID171782610.

Do You Wait For Opponent To Respond For Game Pigeon Play

Do You Wait For Opponent To Respond For Game Pigeon Today